Z3R0 Posted December 12, 2011 Posted December 12, 2011 (edited) *sigh* 86 for (set .@a, 0; .@a <= 1000000; set .@a, .@a + 1) { mes "" + .@a; } close; Edited December 12, 2011 by Z3R0 Newbish Code Quote
Emistry Posted December 12, 2011 Posted December 12, 2011 (edited) for (set .@a, 0; .@a <= 1000000; set .@a, .@a + 1) {[/color] mes "" + .@a;[/color] } close; LOL.... mistake....suppose to coninue at 86 ~ 1000000 87 Edited December 12, 2011 by Emistry Quote
Emistry Posted December 13, 2011 Posted December 13, 2011 (edited) 94 Edited December 13, 2011 by Emistry Quote
Z3R0 Posted December 13, 2011 Posted December 13, 2011 for (set .@a, 98; .@a <= 1000000; set .@a, .@a + 1) { mes "" + .@a; } close; Quote
Brian Posted December 13, 2011 Posted December 13, 2011 (edited) 99, and 100 (going by post numbers) Where did we get off again? D: Edited December 13, 2011 by Brian Quote
Sneaky Posted December 13, 2011 Posted December 13, 2011 100 (going by post numbers) Where did we get off again? D: Yours is supposed to be #99 actually ---> 102 (this is supposed to be 101!) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.