Zezicla Posted June 21, 2013 Posted June 21, 2013 i think just keep both txt sql and re/pre bcuz i liked old stat points and most re so ;p just cool to have both
nanakiwurtz Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 For now, let's switch to github with the what so called 'Mixed' repo first. Then make 2 votes later.. First from the developer side. Second from the user side. We need to find a solution that will satisfy both parties.
CandyCandy Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 (edited) Do you remember how developers dropped "stable" branch in 2008 IMHO if you going to fragment re and pre-re more than it is now, including sources and stuff, it's easy to predict the same fate -.-; Edited June 23, 2013 by CandyCandy 1
anacondaq Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 Kisuka, nice trolling! I think developers not idiots here, and they understand main thing. Ragnarok Online it's classic mechanic. "pre-re" it's root of all things. If someone will touch "pre-re", i think ro will be die with this community, and other else communityes after 1-2 month. And i will help to do that too. Why branch out PRE-RE? Leave it the way it is, rAthena is good as it is now.If we do create branches, we'd have three:Mixed RE/pre-RE, as it is now. RE only. Pre-RE only. The main branch would be the first, so you wouldn't notice anything different.(Again, this is a big "if" - we're always short of developers.) you want decrease or increase dev. work? I cannot understand. Stop this thread, and close it. I can't watch this thread, because i get butthurt.
Patskie Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Stay with what we have now. This will disrupt the development of rAthena because developers will indeed have a double work and double time. And not all developers here will give their 24 hours time for just branching out pre renewal. And if this will be done, Too many problems will approach esp to developers. One of which is what Euphy said that we're in lack of developers. And one thing, this will be a lot of hard work but will benefit not that much at all. IMO
Akinari Posted July 12, 2013 Posted July 12, 2013 This really shouldn't be a discussion anymore. There have been many man hours put into preserving pre-re throughout the renewal attack modification, so branching it out at this point would not only be a waste of time, but a disgrace to the one(s) who put all the time and effort into preserving pre-re the way it is now. If anyone feels this should remain an open suggestion, I will leave this open for the next day or 2 before rejecting it. 2
Stolao Posted July 12, 2013 Posted July 12, 2013 This really shouldn't be a discussion anymore. There have been many man hours put into preserving pre-re throughout the renewal attack modification, so branching it out at this point would not only be a waste of time, but a disgrace to the one(s) who put all the time and effort into preserving pre-re the way it is now. If anyone feels this should remain an open suggestion, I will leave this open for the next day or 2 before rejecting it. Kill it with fire!
Recommended Posts