Jump to content

  

19 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Before we get to far.. should we use IPB 3.1 (currently what you see here) or IPB 3.2.2 (the latest version)?

Here's an example if you haven't seen what IPB 3.2 looks like:

IPB 3.1 = (this board)

IPB 3.2.2 = http://eathena.sourceforge.net/ipb322/

I didn't like 3.2.2 because it felt a little sluggish

- Live Search in the ACP loads slower.. XD

- click Sign In -> AJAX window and Chrome doesn't autocomplete the fields (not sure about other browsers)

Posted

id say we keep updated as much as possible :) , it avoids a possible securty exploit infection, the newer the harder to ffind an exploit, its rare but can happen,

just my opinion

and it loads fine for me

have a good day man

Posted

Agreed. Up to date, unless it breaks...

Often times, you may see a tad bit of performance issue when it comes to increased security, but I'm sure we all understand that it's always a toss up..

Posted

I kinda agree with jguy on this one... the look feel (roundness) of this theme makes that one look over the top professional, which can be a good / bad thing

Posted

I am also in favor of staying up to date, because in most cases ipb updates are because of security or bug fixes. And nowadays this is something that shouldnt be left aside.

Posted

i would love to choose it if there have a better User Interface ..

however, i feel that the current one is quite good already ^^

at least i think so...

Posted

Although 3.2 is updated, I've hosted my forums with IPB 3.2 and the ACP is very slow and I feel it's unorganized. As for player view, I don't feel like it's organized properly either.. =/

As for 3.1, I like how the ACP is set up, more organized, and so is the Player View.

Posted

Although 3.2 is updated, I've hosted my forums with IPB 3.2 and the ACP is very slow and I feel it's unorganized. As for player view, I don't feel like it's organized properly either.. =/

As for 3.1, I like how the ACP is set up, more organized, and so is the Player View.

When I was testing to see if SourceForge's project web hosting could support IPB, I installed both 3.1 (this forum) and 3.2.2 (here). Both work on SF's hosting, but I came to the same conclusions you did and I prefer 3.1 too.

Posted

well, perhaps we stay on 3.1 maybe 3.3 will be better than 3.2? Just BE Postively sure that whatever leaks 3.2 fixed, aren't documented anywhere as far as "how to bypass" :)

Posted

If the problems[as in security issues] don't happen in this version [or there are fixes to implement that fix them] I would say to keep this one since the look is far better then newest version although a theme can always be applied to the new version and make it look better or like this one.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...