Akkarin

I'm inclined to rm -rf them with the exception of an installation guide. That's really the only thing I'd expect to see - not a link to a page that loads other offline files in iframes. All the other information in them is already in files accessible offline. I'll sort something out and put this to bed before the end of next weekend.

Are you using the correct packet_db version?

Are there any errors showing up on the char server? When trying to create the new character, how far do you get? (Are you able to click on the button, can you get to the creation screen, can you change the stat modifier?)

Have you all gone crazy? o.O Subversion is designed to merge working directory with new content - it takes into account that the user may have modified data and carries out the updates/merges accordingly o_o

Found in an old thread:

Did you upload a .tmp instead of a .thor file? Did you add the correct file to your patch list?

Those are configurable in trunk/conf/groups.conf

The file you need to edit is php.ini - are you using something like wamp?

This is your problem

Aren't the commands going to be a necessity for this: http://rathena.org/board/topic/68198-07252012-kro-maintenance/page__hl__%2Bwave+%2Bdungeon ?

For fluxCP http://rathena.org/board/topic/67027-rss2news-for-fluxcp/ You can adapt that if you're not using flux too.

It's caused by the amount of colours - when you save the bitmap, it has to '24-bit Bitmap' (i think... it's one of those). Any more and the client crashes because it doesn't know how to handle the additional colours.

No problem Can a mod move this script requests?

Not really xD If users are going to learn, they should learn to do things properly.

I seem to have missed this subforum, possibly because nothing was posted in it until Spre's this morning. However, i'd like to suggest it gets removed from the forum. In the past when new users didn't know what they were doing (myself included at one stage) pre-compiled releases were briliant. At the moment though, the general userbase is able to follow instructions on how to checkout and compile a revision on any OS, and there are very few posts about this - I wouldn't like to see users falling back into what some of us would call old habbits. I like having users who don't know what they're doing checking out the wiki - it's how they learn. The more they learn, the less support topics get opened. If we keep the subforum and more builds get submitted, then one of my favourite phrases can be applied "No point making things fool poof.. they just make better fools :/". This is just my two pennys - Spre don't hate on me @[email protected]

Could you elaborate a bit more o.O do you get any mapserver errors? did you change the sprite? are you using a custom/class sprite? did you change any of the co-ordinates?

Joseph, that download link doesn't seem to work.. This achieves the same thing, but scripted: - script atcmd_afk -1,{ OnInit: bindatcmd("afk","atcmd_afk::Onafk"); bindatcmd("unafk","atcmd_afk::Onunafk"); end; Onafk: headupper=getlook(4); changelook 4,471; end; Onunafk: changelook 4,headupper; end; }

Did you change the crc element in the configs in main.ini?

*Intentionally "bump"s into the topic* Just wondering if anyone was working on the theoretical design before going afk? If not, I can give it ago?

Is that a hint

To be fair, when i first svn co'd eAthena i never noticed them until about a year later. Personally, i think they're nice to have.. but we have a perfectly good wiki and a /doc/ directory that explains everything in greater detail. 22 different viewers and only 10 votes. All you need to do is select one

*headdesk*

Lots of users viewing, but not alot of voting! Come on people, let me know your opinions

That i may be good at dogsitting... WAT OR I might be a good Event GM:

The html readme files has been in the svn since forever, but I'm trying to gauge how many users actually use them. This survey is designed to gather that information, then we can discuss what to do. I would appreciate it if everyone could select the option that closely reflects their own opinion.