lekkereten

Merry Xmas lads

@Secrets Why not C++14? I believe all compilers that matter support. Also Azeroth said about this probably: https://github.com/eathena/eathena/tree/eapp

Do you plan on using modern C++ for this port?

Kay, but about the inventario inventory thing they put up a note about not translating it, I'm confused.

Cydh, good idea on the language thing, maybe I will do that.

What about making these strings translatable? const char* msg_langtype2langstr(int langtype){ switch(langtype){ case 0: return "English (ENG)"; case 1: return "Russian (RUS)"; case 2: return "Spanish (SPN)"; case 3: return "German (GRM)"; case 4: return "Chinese (CHN)"; case 5: return "Malasian (MAL)"; case 6: return "Indonesian (IDN)"; case 7: return "French (FRN)"; case 8: return "Brazilian Portuguese (POR)"; default: return "??"; } }Mainly because of:461: Language is now set to %s.If you set your language to french, the text in 461 will be in french but the language name itself will be in english.I don't have time anymore for this week so if you find that this is a good thing to implement...

I can't get it to work here with Windows 8. Maybe you will be more lucky than me. Here: dVdk 2.1.2.0.zip

I guess it was part of the GID-thingy. It needs to be reworked. Read http://rathena.org/board/tracker/issue-4999-mob-control-command-reference-at-script-commands/'>this and specially AnnieRuru's reply.

Is this helpful? Packets I could extract from 2013-03-13cRagexeRE: http://pastebin.com/6cbSuCba 2012-07-24aRagexeRE: http://pastebin.com/xYhVZL8f Also, k3dt and giv:

Nessuno dà un cazzo se tu vada, davvero.

Do you have the translation of the buttons?

Su panel de control esta en lo mismo host que tu servidor (mismo phpMyAdmin)? Me parece ser un problema de acceso (mal login/contraseña/ip)

Tienes una configuracion en config.php como esta? $CONFIG['gm_hide'] = '40'; // GMs this level and above will be hidden from whoisonline.php Esto esconde todos los GMs con nível mayor que 40 de Quién Está Online. Si usted ha logado solamente con GMs esto puede explicar su problema.

@malufett About this: // packet: 0x8b7 // len: 10 struct PACKET_HC_SECOND_PASSWD_REQ { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned long AID /* this+0x6 */ unsigned long Seed } // packet: 0x8b8 // len: 12 struct PACKET_CH_SECOND_PASSWD_ACK { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned long AID /* this+0x6 */ char SecondPWIdx[6] } // packet: 0x8b9 // len: 4 struct PACKET_HC_SECOND_PASSWD_LOGIN { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned short Result } // packet: 0x8ba // len: 16 struct PACKET_CH_MAKE_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned long AID /* this+0x6 */ unsigned long Seed /* this+0xa */ char SecondPWIdx[6] } // packet: 0x8bb // len: 4 struct PACKET_HC_MAKE_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned short Result } // packet: 0x8bc // len: 16 struct PACKET_CH_DELETE_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned long AID /* this+0x6 */ unsigned long Seed /* this+0xa */ char SecondPWIdx[6] } // packet: 0x8bd // len: 4 struct PACKET_HC_DELETE_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned short Result } // packet: 0x8be // len: 16 struct PACKET_CH_EDIT_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned long AID /* this+0x6 */ unsigned long Seed /* this+0xa */ char SecondPWIdx[6] } // packet: 0x8bf // len: 4 struct PACKET_HC_EDIT_SECOND_PASSWD { /* this+0x0 */ short PacketType /* this+0x2 */ unsigned short Result } I'm using 2012-04-10 and I get these lengths, which I are the ones already *not* fully implemented. I found yours on this link. Ain't this bRO's packets? This post is also relevant: this

yes it can..just need little help.. You can join on IRC so we can help/discuss/etc @_@ Also I don't recall this being active in bRO (only kafra pwd)

How this PIN system works in kRO and in which versions it is avaiable?

Sí sí muy bueno el sistema, finalmente!

Implemented in r17048.

It is. Rejecting then.

Added in r17038

Added in r17038, code is not the most optimized but it is well documented and explanatory.

Why you always suggest stuff AFTER we implement it But yeah this way looks good too

Mempool was disabled in r17021.

Si no tienes problema en cambiar la "version" yo hecho esto una vez.