adjusting the success rate of socket enchant

[PapaZola]

thanks

Edited March 7, 2013 by PapaZola

[Playtester]

Check these lines:

 

case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,40,66,200,1010,10;

 

Basically you roll a 100-sided dice and if the number is between those two numbers (excluding), it is successful.

 

1460 in this case is the item required and 1461 is the item you will get. If you want to increase the chance for example change it to:

 

case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,35,71,200,1010,10;

[PapaZola]

im edy edit sir not work T_T

 

                        case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,100,100,200,1010,10;

 

 

[Emistry]

change

set .@a, rand(1,100);
if ((.@a > getarg(2)) && (.@a < getarg(3)))
{

 

to

if( .@i ){

 

there is alot way to make it into 100% ....just simply pick 1 ...

[PapaZola]

sir emistry not working

[Playtester]

"100,100" would be mean between 100 and 100 which is 0%.

 

If you do not change the thing Emistry did, then you can achieve 100% success by doing this:

 

 case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,0,101,200,1010,10;

 

 

An easier way is to just change the if to something that is always true like "if(1)" or "if(true)" (not sure if that works in scripts, though).

[PapaZola]

thanks now its work

[seveneyed]

Check these lines:

 

case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,40,66,200,1010,10;

 

Basically you roll a 100-sided dice and if the number is between those two numbers (excluding), it is successful.

 

1460 in this case is the item required and 1461 is the item you will get. If you want to increase the chance for example change it to:

 

case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,35,71,200,1010,10;

 

 

 

"100,100" would be mean between 100 and 100 which is 0%.

 

If you do not change the thing Emistry did, then you can achieve 100% success by doing this:

 

 case 1: callfunc "Func_Socket",1460,1461,0,101,200,1010,10;

 

 

An easier way is to just change the if to something that is always true like "if(1)" or "if(true)" (not sure if that works in scripts, though).

 

 

Thank you so much