[Request] Berserk Modification

[LMF]

Hi guys, i'm quite new here

well i was wondering if this can be possible to do some src modification.

LK, Berserk.

After you cast berserk, you can't talk, skills, even commands.

what if after cast berserk, you only can't do skills? talk and commands enable it.

is that possible?

Best regards,

LMF Ragnarok Online.

[Azeroth]

On 12/12/2011 at 11:11 PM, rootKid said:

i had tested this quite awhile back, and i can confirm that there is indeed a client block on it along with the server side things. hexing the client is required

search: 03 C8 5f 89 4b 08 5e 5b

replace: 03 C8 5f 90 90 90 5e 5b

the code is buggy, you may notice why if you try it. also when searching you will find more than 1 result, just try them all until you get it. this was tested with an older client, not sure about renewal.

note: this works assumings that you have already removed all the checks server side.

Are you able to reproduced this in 2015+ Clients?

[GodLesZ]

I've attached a small diff.

Its untested but removed the berserk check on talk-related functions.

Let me know if it works.

berserk_talkable.diff

Edited November 17, 2011 by GodLesZ

[LMF]

i have a bit different compare with your diff, cause i'm using 3CeAM R650.

if (sd->sc.count && //no "chatting" while muted.
(sd->sc.data[sC_BERSERK] ||
(sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT] && sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT]->val1&MANNER_NOCHAT) ||
(sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP] && sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP]->val2) ||
sd->sc.data[sC_SATURDAYNIGHTFEVER]))
return -1;

so it should be..

-   (sd->sc.data[sC_BERSERK] ||

something like this only?

Edited November 17, 2011 by LMF

[GodLesZ]

so it should be..

-   (sd->sc.data[sC_BERSERK] ||

something like this only?

Without the beginning (, yes.

The block should be

if (sd->sc.count && //no "chatting" while muted.
((sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT] && sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT]->val1&MANNER_NOCHAT) ||
(sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP] && sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP]->val2) ||
sd->sc.data[sC_SATURDAYNIGHTFEVER]))
return -1;

[LMF]

if (sd->sc.count && //no "chatting" while muted.

((sd->sc.data[SC_NOCHAT] && sd->sc.data[SC_NOCHAT]->val1&MANNER_NOCHAT) ||

(sd->sc.data[SC_DEEPSLEEP] && sd->sc.data[SC_DEEPSLEEP]->val2) ||

sd->sc.data[SC_SATURDAYNIGHTFEVER]))

return -1;

can be this way? cause i see the starting should be in ((sd->sc.count && and end at fever]))

Edited November 17, 2011 by LMF

[KeyWorld]

If I remember correctly it's also a client issue (the client avoid to send talk packet to server when you are berserk)

[LMF]

ridiculous.. will test it out ^.^

[GodLesZ]

if (sd->sc.count && //no "chatting" while muted.

((sd->sc.data[SC_NOCHAT] && sd->sc.data[SC_NOCHAT]->val1&MANNER_NOCHAT) ||

(sd->sc.data[SC_DEEPSLEEP] && sd->sc.data[SC_DEEPSLEEP]->val2) ||

sd->sc.data[SC_SATURDAYNIGHTFEVER]))

return -1;

can be this way? cause i see the starting should be in ((sd->sc.count && and end at fever]))

Yep, here the same a bit better:

// No "chatting" while muted
if (
   sd->sc.count &&
   (
       (sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT] && sd->sc.data[sC_NOCHAT]->val1&MANNER_NOCHAT) ||
       (sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP] && sd->sc.data[sC_DEEPSLEEP]->val2) ||
       sd->sc.data[sC_SATURDAYNIGHTFEVER]
   )
)
   return -1;

If I remember correctly it's also a client issue (the client avoid to send talk packet to server when you are berserk)

Strange if so. But yea, this sounds like Gravity

[Mercurial]

another reason for a open source client XD

[GodLesZ]

another reason for a open source client XD

Lets see how KeyWorld's roBrowser comes up.

@LMF: Any results on testing yet?

[rootKid]

i had tested this quite awhile back, and i can confirm that there is indeed a client block on it along with the server side things. hexing the client is required

search: 03 C8 5f 89 4b 08 5e 5b

replace: 03 C8 5f 90 90 90 5e 5b

the code is buggy, you may notice why if you try it. also when searching you will find more than 1 result, just try them all until you get it. this was tested with an older client, not sure about renewal.

note: this works assumings that you have already removed all the checks server side.

Edited December 13, 2011 by kou

[QQfoolsorellina]

Can you tell us what is your client date?

[rootKid]

sorry for the delay, had to find out.

2008-09-10aSakexe is the exe that i got it to work on