Using "bAddClass,Class_All" instead of "bAtkRate"?

[eppc0330]

I wonder why an item script for ATK + @ % is "bAddClass, Class_All" instead of "bAtkRate"

Does it not work well If I use bAtkRate?

Edited June 4, 2020 by eppc0330

[TheKingDino]

They are done this way because that's how the damage is calculated in official renewal. You can use bAtkRate,n;. It's a bonus that works. But it is unofficial.

[eppc0330]

On 6/6/2020 at 12:45 PM, TheKingDino said:

They are done this way because that's how the damage is calculated in official renewal. You can use bAtkRate,n;. It's a bonus that works. But it is unofficial.

Oh I have checked this reply just right now. I understood. Thank you!!!!

[Olivier13300]

Hello, to display the atk in % (bonus bAtkRate,n;) on the pre-renewal stats, please open pc.hpp and do the following.

Look for the line
     #define pc_leftside_atk(sd) ((sd)->battle_status.batk + (sd)->battle_status.rhw.atk + (sd)->battle_status.lhw.atk)

replace with 

#define pc_leftside_atk(sd) (((sd)->battle_status.batk + (sd)->battle_status.rhw.atk + (sd)->battle_status.lhw.atk) * (100 + (sd)->bonus.atk_rate) / 100)

I hope this helps a few people

[oneandonlyblake]

On 10/11/2024 at 4:28 PM, Olivier13300 said:

Hello, to display the atk in % (bonus bAtkRate,n;) on the pre-renewal stats, please open pc.hpp and do the following.

Look for the line
     #define pc_leftside_atk(sd) ((sd)->battle_status.batk + (sd)->battle_status.rhw.atk + (sd)->battle_status.lhw.atk)

replace with 

#define pc_leftside_atk(sd) (((sd)->battle_status.batk + (sd)->battle_status.rhw.atk + (sd)->battle_status.lhw.atk) * (100 + (sd)->bonus.atk_rate) / 100)

I hope this helps a few people

I tried this and recompiled not working for me.