Lincoln Binda

This is so easy to get around that it's not worth the effort, there are many tools that change your IP so this would only be a setting for some people

Let the necessary changes in the 'mob.cpp' file: change it: int mob_getdroprate(struct block_list *src, std::shared_ptr<s_mob_db> mob, int base_rate, int drop_modifier, mob_data* md) to: int mob_getdroprate(struct block_list *src, std::shared_ptr<s_mob_db> mob, int base_rate, int drop_modifier, mob_data* md, int nameid) still in the same file, in the same function, change this: if (sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)) drop_rate_bonus += sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)->val1; to: if (sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)) { int mob_id = mob->id; int item_id = nameid; int excluded_item_ids[] = {1202}; // Knife_ = 1202 int excluded_mob_ids[] = {1002}; // Poring = 1002 bool is_excluded_item = false; bool is_excluded_mob = false; for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(excluded_item_ids)/sizeof(excluded_item_ids[0]); i++) { if(item_id == excluded_item_ids[i]) { is_excluded_item = true; break; } } for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(excluded_mob_ids)/sizeof(excluded_mob_ids[0]); i++) { if(mob_id == excluded_mob_ids[i]) { is_excluded_mob = true; break; } } // Only apply the SC_ITEMBOOST if the item and mob aren't in the excluded lists if(!is_excluded_item && !is_excluded_mob) { drop_rate_bonus += sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)->val1; } } inside the loop "for (i = 0; i < MAX_MOB_DROP_TOTAL; i++) {" Change it: drop_rate = mob_getdroprate(src, md->db, md->db->dropitem[i].rate, drop_modifier, md); to: drop_rate = mob_getdroprate(src, md->db, md->db->dropitem[i].rate, drop_modifier, md, md->db->dropitem[i].nameid); in archive 'mob.hpp' change it: int mob_getdroprate(struct block_list *src, std::shared_ptr<s_mob_db> mob, int base_rate, int drop_modifier, mob_data* md = nullptr); to: int mob_getdroprate(struct block_list *src, std::shared_ptr<s_mob_db> mob, int base_rate, int drop_modifier, mob_data* md, int nameid); and finally in the 'atcommand.cpp' file, change it: int droprate = mob_getdroprate( &sd->bl, mob, mob->dropitem[i].rate, drop_modifier ); to: int droprate = mob_getdroprate( &sd->bl, mob, mob->dropitem[i].rate, drop_modifier, nullptr, mob->dropitem[i].nameid ); I had to use a breakpoint in visual studio to find out that the md->mob_id was null and that's why the @mi command was closing the map-server. soon I realized that inside the function there is already mob data just by accessing the 'mob->id'. the item_id conflict I solved by adding a new parameter, consequently it is mandatory to change the parameters for the other calls, maybe there is a better way to access the item_id but this way works great for me.

It's late for me, it's almost 3 am here, anyway it's an interesting setup, tomorrow I'll test it to eliminate the conflicts

For mob_id: If you're in a context where a monster is being handled (like in the drop function), you might have access to a mob_data structure or something similar, from which you can get the monster ID. It might look something like this: int mob_id = md->class_; 'md' is a commonly used abbreviation for mob_data in rAthena source code.

- script DryadKillCounter -1,{ OnPCKillEvent: if (killedrid == DRYAD_MOB_ID) { .@kills = killcount(DRYAD_MOB_ID); if (.@kills == 100) { set saveMap$, strcharinfo(3); set saveX, getcharinfo(0); set saveY, getcharinfo(1); warp "sec_pri", X_COORD, Y_COORD; // Teleport player to sec_pri (Replace X_COORD and Y_COORD with actual coordinates) } } end; } sec_pri,X_COORD,Y_COORD,5 script Returning NPC 722,{ if (killcount(DRYAD_MOB_ID) > 99) { mes "I noticed you've killed 100 Dryads in um_fild01."; mes "Do you want to return to where you were?"; next; if(select("Yes:No") == 1) { set killcount(DRYAD_MOB_ID), 0; // Reset the kill count for Dryads warp saveMap$, saveX, saveY; // Return player to their saved location } } else { mes "You have no reason to interact with me."; } close; } pay attention to items: X_COORD Y_COORD DRYAD_MOB_ID Just make the appropriate substitutions

if (sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)) { // List of item IDs and mob IDs to exclude int excluded_item_ids[] = {1202}; // Knife_ = 1202 int excluded_mob_ids[] = {1002}; // Poring = 1002 // Check if the current item_id and mob_id are not in the excluded lists bool is_excluded_item = false; bool is_excluded_mob = false; for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(excluded_item_ids)/sizeof(excluded_item_ids[0]); i++) { if(item_id == excluded_item_ids[i]) { is_excluded_item = true; break; } } for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(excluded_mob_ids)/sizeof(excluded_mob_ids[0]); i++) { if(mob_id == excluded_mob_ids[i]) { is_excluded_mob = true; break; } } // Only apply the SC_ITEMBOOST if the item and mob aren't in the excluded lists if(!is_excluded_item && !is_excluded_mob) { drop_rate_bonus += sd->sc.getSCE(SC_ITEMBOOST)->val1; } } You can test this or at least get an idea to follow

O projeto ainda existe me pleno ano de 2023?