anacondaq Posted March 3, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 42 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1096 Reputation: 345 Joined: 02/26/12 Last Seen: May 30, 2023 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Okay, in future, i want to see ipv6 support for rathena. Where server gm can switch beetwin ipv4, and ipv6 by configs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenpachi Posted March 4, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 22 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 764 Reputation: 220 Joined: 11/14/11 Last Seen: November 19, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2013 In my opinion there is no reason to implement IPv6 support soon. It would be used by just a handful of server owners and causes a lot of work...http://www.google.com/ipv6/statistics.html 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curiosity Posted March 5, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 133 Reputation: 189 Joined: 05/20/12 Last Seen: November 7, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Does the client even support IPv6? Even if it's network stack does, in the packets the server addresses are sent as unsigned 32bit integers, which aren't big enough to hold an IPv6 address (which is 128 bit). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dev iAmMar Posted May 29, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 51 Reputation: 2 Joined: 02/18/12 Last Seen: May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Yup , Kenpachi is right there is no reason to implement IPv6 in rathena Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts