MarkZD Posted January 7, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 134 Reputation: 35 Joined: 02/27/12 Last Seen: April 5, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2013 <clydelion> MarkZD, have you checked this out? https://github.com/ratalaika/eikasia<clydelion> Seems good to be partnered with rathena (as in Hackshield to ragnarok) <clydelion> http://eathena.ws/forum/topic/1078-eikasia-security-system-open-source/#entry4434 <clydelion> The creator said he'll upload server side diffs too <clydelion> But that's a few weeks ago <clydelion> ah, 2weeks ago I didn't look yet, I'll just leave it here as a record, maybe someone wants to give a look/say something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malufett Posted January 7, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 554 Reputation: 70 Joined: 04/04/12 Last Seen: November 8, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 is this against the GNU General Public License? just in case this is approve.. modify the dll and enhance it however src are not released only the modified dll for security sake.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenBox Posted January 8, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 303 Reputation: 101 Joined: 11/13/11 Last Seen: October 11, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2013 1. This shouldn't be opensource neither in the server neither in the client, or it can be easily bypassed. 2. Analysing the module codes pratically every module creates a thread with an infinite loop, extreme overhead. 3. Will work only with a small range of clients. I could present several more inconsistencies on his code but I'm lazy o-o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malufett Posted January 8, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 554 Reputation: 70 Joined: 04/04/12 Last Seen: November 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I could present several more inconsistencies on his code but I'm lazy o-o hahaha..but it can be improved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenBox Posted January 8, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 303 Reputation: 101 Joined: 11/13/11 Last Seen: October 11, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Well, it would be practically a complete rewrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malufett Posted January 8, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 554 Reputation: 70 Joined: 04/04/12 Last Seen: November 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 well..it sounds good for me..since we still have a chance to have a security mechanism for the emu.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighta Posted January 9, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 16 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 737 Reputation: 216 Joined: 11/29/11 Last Seen: December 20, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I'm not agreing with this : 1. This shouldn't be opensource neither in the server neither in the client, or it can be easily bypassed. Opensource doesn't mean bypassable and keep it closed will still present the failure if so just more difficult to find them/exploit. Or do you mean user need to hide their keys ? (sound obvious) Is that for all windows NT ? checking process running by name =( Don't get why he didn't do that in something more portative but it's a good side project wich probably give eA a regain of interest. (or people just gonna get lazy and complain). Anyway one of most wanted thing from user I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenBox Posted January 10, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 9 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 303 Reputation: 101 Joined: 11/13/11 Last Seen: October 11, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Why should be portable? RO just runs on Windows. Knowing how something works, mainly having the source, is the first step to bypass something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted January 16, 2013 Group: Members Topic Count: 20 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 213 Reputation: 109 Joined: 05/21/12 Last Seen: December 27, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I partially agree with GreenBox--however, if it is open-source it'll be easier for any bypassing to be made aware by the community and thus fixed. However, it's two-fold as it can get complicated to full-proof a hack-shield when the ENTIRE source is available for public eyes. While I love the enthusiasm for this, I would also like to add that with all of the instability within the main project itself I think having this side-project would just add to the TO-DO list and thus complicate the goals/vision for the overall project. I'm not opposed to it but that's my thoughts. Don't throw a plethora of hate my way. eikasia... I hate the name. Change it to Cookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts