Ind Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Hai. I'm here to give you guys a explanation on r15390. We, developers, spent a reasonable amount of time discussing what'd be a more organized, less cluttered, manner to work with pre-re and re files, and thats' what we came with. If the changeset is not clear to you, run a svn update and see how it is now. should you have any comments regarding this you'd like to share, post below. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilith Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Thanks! It really simplifies search of files. Very useful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judas Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 very organizeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emistry Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Oh....much more organized..and easier to differentiate which is RE / Pre-Re Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemongrass Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 will the SQL part also get this kind of structure or will it be left as it is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ind Posted January 4, 2012 Author Share Posted January 4, 2012 yes we will be upgrading the sql dbs as well, should be soon, in a future commit 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denken Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 nice work Ind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeiKun Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 not bad well organized as i can i see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemongrass Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 do you intent to rename/restructure the tables or do you only want to structure the .sql files to insert them? i would appreciate the second thing and i believe a lot of people will share my opinion, since everyone would have to rewrite everything that is "custom" like control panels etc without any real purpose behind the change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gepard Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I think only *.sql scripts should be organized in the same fashion as db folder. I don't see any reason to rename tables. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkzBR Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Its more smart to create a function that load the file according to server mode and returns a pointer that do a #ifdef on each file that load database file. So you'll put just anything like "FILE* f = load_dbfile('refine_db');" and the function do the propers concatenations on file name. Sorry for english, i'm on my gf macbook and i hate iAnything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fiction Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Good work! very organized! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtremist Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 I liked the organization. But hope that theres no redundancy in there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nameless2you Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Good idea, much clearer and easier to use, wonder how you'll use this on sql though. Hope it won't be too big of a change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kraiser X Astral Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Nice one! Now its very easy to organize the files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
