Jump to content

r15390 - /db/ re-design


Ind

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  169
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1260
  • Reputation:   750
  • Joined:  11/19/11
  • Last Seen:  

Hai. I'm here to give you guys a explanation on r15390.

We, developers, spent a reasonable amount of time discussing what'd be a more organized, less cluttered, manner to work with pre-re and re files, and thats' what we came with. If the changeset is not clear to you, run a svn update and see how it is now.

should you have any comments regarding this you'd like to share, post below.

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  24
  • Reputation:   13
  • Joined:  12/09/11
  • Last Seen:  

I love it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  407
  • Reputation:   159
  • Joined:  11/18/11
  • Last Seen:  

Thanks! It really simplifies search of files. Very useful! /no1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  26
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2244
  • Reputation:   182
  • Joined:  11/19/11
  • Last Seen:  

very organizeed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Forum Moderator
  • Topic Count:  93
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  10013
  • Reputation:   2345
  • Joined:  10/28/11
  • Last Seen:  

Oh....much more organized..and easier to differentiate which is RE / Pre-Re /no1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Developer
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  547
  • Reputation:   270
  • Joined:  11/08/11
  • Last Seen:  

will the SQL part also get this kind of structure or will it be left as it is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  169
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1260
  • Reputation:   750
  • Joined:  11/19/11
  • Last Seen:  

yes we will be upgrading the sql dbs as well, should be soon, in a future commit

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  24
  • Reputation:   1
  • Joined:  11/12/11
  • Last Seen:  

nice work Ind

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  31
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  967
  • Reputation:   53
  • Joined:  11/13/11
  • Last Seen:  

not bad

well organized

as i can i see

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Developer
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  547
  • Reputation:   270
  • Joined:  11/08/11
  • Last Seen:  

do you intent to rename/restructure the tables or do you only want to structure the .sql files to insert them? i would appreciate the second thing and i believe a lot of people will share my opinion, since everyone would have to rewrite everything that is "custom" like control panels etc without any real purpose behind the change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  22
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  392
  • Reputation:   285
  • Joined:  12/19/11
  • Last Seen:  

I think only *.sql scripts should be organized in the same fashion as db folder. I don't see any reason to rename tables.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  27
  • Reputation:   5
  • Joined:  11/19/11
  • Last Seen:  

Its more smart to create a function that load the file according to server mode and returns a pointer that do a #ifdef on each file that load database file. So you'll put just anything like "FILE* f = load_dbfile('refine_db');" and the function do the propers concatenations on file name.

Sorry for english, i'm on my gf macbook and i hate iAnything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  44
  • Reputation:   1
  • Joined:  01/03/12
  • Last Seen:  

Good work! very organized!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  196
  • Reputation:   20
  • Joined:  11/20/11
  • Last Seen:  

I liked the organization.

But hope that theres no redundancy in there :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  351
  • Reputation:   52
  • Joined:  11/15/11
  • Last Seen:  

Good idea, much clearer and easier to use, wonder how you'll use this on sql though.

Hope it won't be too big of a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  18
  • Reputation:   1
  • Joined:  12/14/11
  • Last Seen:  

Nice one! Now its very easy to organize the files.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...