nanakiwurtz Posted June 14, 2015 Group: Members Topic Count: 81 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 1654 Reputation: 583 Joined: 08/09/12 Last Seen: January 14, 2020 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Hello there, I have a question that bugs me for long time. That is about the 'getpartymember' behavior, why does it needs to put the result into an array of temporary global variables What I saw from numerous scripts around is that we have to use getpartymember + copyarray just to move it somewhere else, so it won't be overwritten with new data. And also for the 'type', do we need to specify 1 or 2 everytime? Can it just accept 3 as bitmask? Or just remove the 'type' completely If this suggestion is considered as useful and someone starts to rewrite the code, then I guess we still have to maintain backward compatibility... Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cydh Posted June 15, 2015 Group: Developer Topic Count: 153 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 2285 Reputation: 745 Joined: 06/16/12 Last Seen: June 30, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2015 yes yes, they're annoying also with the getguildmember. just, somehow I think better u post something like this on public, hmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stolao Posted June 15, 2015 Group: Developer Topic Count: 48 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1443 Reputation: 337 Joined: 10/17/12 Last Seen: Wednesday at 07:55 PM Share Posted June 15, 2015 that does seem kinda "noob" and unpolished, just l payed with on my test server and ya it doesn't make much sense to basically be forced to copy the array basically every time after its generated. shouldn't this be changed to something a little more convenient | logical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.